I read today that the atheism proponent Lewis Wolpert proposed in a new book that man's tendancy toward religion is some kind of genetic mutation based on causal evolution (something in our prehistory caused our ancestors to develop religion - and that somehow worked it's way inot our genetic pool).

Causal evolution of genetic predisposition to religious belief flies in the face of evolutionary theory – it would not provide a single benefit allowing the advancement of the species and therefore, it would be much more likely that the majority of the population would not have the “religiosity gene.”

If we are created by God, it only stands to reason that we are imbued with “religious beliefs (that) are at least partly genetically determined. How else can you explain the fact that there's no society ever discovered that didn't have some sort of religious belief?"

Quite simply, no matter how much or how often God is denied, it does not cause him to no longer exist. Napoleon (granted, not known as a great thinker) once said, “You think your are too intelligent to believe in God. I am not like you.”

Belief in the non-existence of God requires 1) the belief that there may be a god to not believe in and 2) a complete lack understanding of your station in the universe.

Belief in the possibility of a god requires the humility to accept there may be forces greater than an accidental existence.

Belief in God as your creator requires the humility to accept that existence came from something bigger than yourself, something other than a mere accident.

The God I believe in is “…immutable, immense, eternal, incomprehensible, almighty, most wise, most holy, most free, most absolute, working all things according to the counsel of his own immutable and most righteous will,” (Westminster Confession of Faith, Ch II.1)

A closer reading will note that it does not limit God to my interpretation of him. He is incomprehensible – I can understand aspects of him, but I cannot understand him in totality – because, although I am created in his image, I am not him.

When I free my interpretation of God from the box I want to place him in, I understand that science is a good and great tool for us to understand the universe, that it will likely be used to discover new life forms and that those life forms were created by the same God in which I believe.